Recording in different locations
using different microphones
During
this task I had to record an acoustic guitar using an Olympus multi-track
linear PCM recorder. I had to plug the male end of the XLR lead into the device
and then plugged the female end into the adapter, which is the microphone. I
then had to test that there was signal coming from the microphone to the
recorder, this was visible on the screen of the device.
I
recorded in the following locations:
- A classroom = clear and loud.
- A concert hall = not as clear
and as loud as classroom.
- Outdoors = picked up a little background
noise.
I used
the following microphones:
- Shure SM58 = Dynamic
- Rode NT2-A = Condenser
- AKG C1000s = Condenser
Other
equipment used:
- XLR Leads (x2)
- Acoustic Guitar
- Olympus multi-track linear PCM
recorder
- Microphone stand for Shure SM58
& AKG C1000S
- Microphone stand for Rode NT2-A
Track
List and Evaluation:
Location
|
Classroom
|
Microphone
|
Shure SM58 (1)
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
7
|
I used
a cardioid polar pattern, which picks up sound from the front and the sides. I
used this polar pattern, as I wanted a direct sound of just the acoustic
guitar.
There
was no background noise and the quality was clear and the dynamics were
suitable. A few times on the track you could hear the guitarist take their
fingers off the fret to change chords. Due to the sound being natural I think
that this sound enhanced the track. Below is a diagram of a cardioid polar
pattern.
Location
|
Classroom
|
Microphone
|
Shure SM58 (2)
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
7
|
I used
2 Shure SM58 microphones to create a stereo sound. Due to only having one
microphone stand that adapted to a Shure SM58 someone had to hold the other microphone,
which may have affected the sound, but luckily it didn’t. The sound was very clear and the
dynamics were loud but equal. The positions of where the microphones go are
shown on the diagram below. The bridge placement is for the low frequency and
the fret placement is for the high frequency.
Location
|
Classroom
|
Microphone
|
Rode NT2-A
|
Polar Pattern
|
Omni
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
6
|
I did
not intentionally change the polar pattern however it did not impact the
recording in any negative way. The Omni polar pattern gathers sound from all
around the room compared to a direct sound from 1 instrument. You would
typically use an Omni polar pattern when recording a full orchestra.
There
was no background sound during the recording but I did have to turn the gain
down due to the dynamics being to loud to begin with after the gain was turned
down the dynamics were good and the sound was clear.
Location
|
Classroom
|
Microphone
|
AKG C1000S
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
6
|
The
dynamics were moderate and the sound was clear. However, you could hear the
guitarist taking their fingers off the fret to change chords only this time I
believe it hindered the recording, as the sound was high pitched and didn’t
sound natural.
Location
|
Concert Hall
|
Microphone
|
Shure SM58 (1)
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
6
|
The dynamics were quiet during this recording; I believe this is because the area was a lot larger. There was no background noise but the sound was indistinct.
Location
|
Concert Hall
|
Microphone
|
Shure SM58 (2)
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
7
|
The
dynamics were quiet and the sound was not very clear. There was no background
noise in this recording.
Location
|
Concert Hall
|
Microphone
|
AKG C1000S
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
7
|
The sound was clear in this recording and also the dynamics were loud. I could hear the guitarist hitting the body of the guitar. I don’t think I could avoid this sound so if I were to do it again I would ask the guitarist to not do this.
Location
|
Concert Hall
|
Microphone
|
Rode NT2-A
|
Polar Pattern
|
Omni
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
7
|
No
background noise was detected and a clear sound throughout. Dynamics were
moderate.
Location
|
Outside
|
Microphone
|
Shure SM58
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
7
|
Dynamics
were quiet and sound was not as clear as I hoped. There was no background
noise.
Location
|
Outside
|
Microphone
|
Shure SM58 (x2)
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
7
|
No
background sound throughout the recording. Dynamics were loud and sound was
relatively clear but could be improved next time.
Location
|
Outside
|
Microphone
|
Rode NT2-A
|
Polar Pattern
|
Omni
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
7
|
Dynamics
were loud and sound was clear. A little bit of background noise but in future
to prevent this I can use specific software’s to block out the background noise
after recording.
Location
|
Outside
|
Microphone
|
AKG C1000S
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from guitar
|
Gain
|
6
|
No
background noise and dynamics were loud. Sound was clear but I could hear the
twanging of the guitar on the track, which could be prevented next time by
moving the microphone further away.
Locations
Overall,
the classroom was the best location to record in as it was clear and loud with
no background noise. Whereas the concert hall was not as clear and as loud and
the outdoor area picked up some background noise in track 11.
Microphones
Overall,
I believe the dynamic Shure SM58 microphone was the best but when it was
recorded in stereo. This picked up more sound and was loud and clear. The AKG
C1000S was the best for dynamics and the sound being clear but the fact you
could hear in too much detail, like the twanging of the strings was the reason
it wasn’t my favorite. The Rode NT2-A was quiet compared to the other
microphones.
Recordings
Most
recordings were very similar as I followed the exact same process throughout.
The only difference between them were one had background sound compared to all
the others which didn’t. Some were louder than others for example the concert
hall recording with the AKG C1000S was a lot louder than the Shure SM58. Also
some were also clearer than others for example outside was clearer than the
concert hall.
Mono
& Stereo
To
create a stereo there must be 2 or more audio channels’ used so I added an
extra Shure SM58 to the recording. The stereo recordings sounded much better
than the mono recording as it was louder and clearer. A mono recording uses one
audio channel so it may have sounded better in stereo as it captured more
sound.
Recording
in the studio
After
recording an instrument in different locations I then progressed my recordings
by going into the studio and recording 5 instruments individually in the studio
on Cubase 7.
I
recorded the following instruments:
- Tambourine
- Vocals with and without an
enclosure
- Guitar
- Piano
- Saxophone
I used
the following microphones:
- Shure SM58 = Dynamic
- Rode NT2-A = Condenser
- AKG C1000s = Condenser
Other
equipment used:
- XLR Leads (x2)
- Acoustic Guitar
- Tambourine
- Electronic Piano
- Enclosure
- Cubase 7
- Microphone stand for Shure SM58
& AKG C1000S
- Microphone stand for Rode NT2-A
Location
|
Recording studio
|
Microphone
|
Shure SM58
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches in front of
tambourine
|
Instrument
|
Tambourine
|
Sound
of tambourine was equal due to the position of the microphone. No background
noise.
Location
|
Recording studio
|
Microphone
|
Rode NT2-A
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from singer
|
Instrument
|
Vocals (with enclosure)
|
Location
|
Recording studio
|
Microphone
|
Rode NT2-A
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from singer
|
Instrument
|
Vocals (without enclosure)
|
An
enclosure is used to prevent unwanted room reflections from reaching the
microphone. Track 2 includes an enclosure, which makes the vocals sound
smoother. There was no backing noise in this recording. I believe track 2 was
much better than track 3 due to the use of the enclosure.
Location
|
Recording studio
|
Microphone
|
AKG C1000S (2)
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from singer
|
Instrument
|
Guitar
|
There
was no backing noise in this recording and the strums were equally balanced. I
believe the recording of the guitar was much better than the recordings outside
of the studio. I think this is because the same is more adaptable for recording
instruments.
Location
|
Recording studio
|
Microphone
|
AKG C1000S (2)
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from singer
|
Instrument
|
Piano
|
Clear sound throughout. Slight unwanted audio at the start but no backing noise afterwards. Sound remained equal throughout.
Location
|
Recording studio
|
Microphone
|
AKG C1000S
|
Polar Pattern
|
Cardioid
|
Distance/Position
|
6 inches away from singer
|
Instrument
|
Saxophone
|
Sound was clear and dynamics were level throughout. No backing noise due to recording in the studio which I believe is the best environment to record in.
Recording Plan
For the last 2 recordings, which were the piano and saxophone our group worked independently. This required us to make a plan and book the studio as shown below.
Piano
|
Saxophone
|
|
Date/Time
|
30th
November 2016
11:20am
|
30th
November 2016
3:45pm
|
Members/Group
Roles
|
Me: Pianist
Rebecca:
Microphone set up
Caitlyn:
Studio
Beth:
Studio
|
Me:
Studio
Rebecca:
Studio
Caitlyn: Saxophonist
Beth:
Microphone set up
|